ICAI-IPCC
May 2011 Tax Paper Solved
(As per
A.Y.2011-12)
Question 1(a)
On 21.3.2010, Mr. Janak gifted to his wife Mrs. Thilagam 200 listed shares which had been bought by him on 19.4.2009 at Rs.2,000 per share. On 1.6.2010, bonus shares were allotted in the ratio of 1:1. All these shares were sold by Mrs. Thilagam as under:
Date of Sale | Manner of Sale | No. of Shares | Net Sales value (Rs.) |
21.5.2010 | Sold in recognized stock exchange, STT paid | 100 | 2,20,000 |
21.7.2010 | Private sale, to an outsider | All bonus shares | 1,25,000 |
28.2.2011 | Private sale, to her friend Mrs. Hema (Market value on this date was Rs.2,10,000) | 100 | 1,70,000 |
Briefly state the income-tax consequences in respect of the sale of the shares by Mrs. Thilagam, showing clearly the person in whose hands the same is chargeable, the quantum and the head of income in respect of the above transactions. Detailed computation of total income NOT required.
Net sales value represents the amount credited after all taxes, levies, brokerage, etc., and the same may be adopted for computing the capital gains.
Solution
Sale of 100 shares
Since shares are sold through recognized stock exchange after holding for more than 12 months (including period of holding of previous owner), hence capital gain, if any, arises on such transfer is exempt u/s 10(38)
Sale of bonus shares
Since shares are not sold through recognized stock exchange, hence short term capital gain of Rs.125000 arises on such transfer is taxable in the hands of Mrs.Thilagam. It is to be noted that:
a. Cost of acquisition of bonus shares shall be Nil
b. In case of accretion of assets transferred by the spouse, clubbing provisions are not applicable.
Sale of remaining 100 shares
Computation of capital gain
Particulars | Amount |
Sale Consideration | 170000 |
Less: Index cost of acquisition [Rs.100 * 2000 * 711 / 632] | 225000 |
Long Term Capital Loss | 55000 |
Such long term capital loss shall be treated as loss of Mr. Janak. | |
Question 1(b)
Nathan Aviation Ltd. is running two industrial undertakings, one in a SFZ (Unit S) and another in a normal area (Unit N). The brief summarized details for the year ended 31.3.2011 are as under :
(Rs. in lacs)
| S | N |
Domestic turnover | 10 | 100 |
Export turnover | 120 | Nil |
Gross profit | 20 | 10 |
Less : Expenses and depreciation | 7 | 6 |
Profits derived from the unit | 13 | 4 |
The brought forward business loss pertaining to Unit N is Rs.2 lacs. Briefly compute the business income of the assessee.
Solution
Computation of business income of Nathan Aviation Ltd. for the A.Y. 2011-12
Particulars | Amount | Amount |
Unit S |
|
|
Profit from Unit | 1300000 |
|
Less: Exemption u/s 10AA [Rs.13 lakh * 120 lakh / 130 lakh] | 1200000 | 100000 |
Unit N |
|
|
Profit from Unit |
| 400000 |
Current year business income |
| 500000 |
Less: Brought forward business loss |
| 200000 |
Business Income |
| 300000 |
Question 1(c)
Pareesh & Co., is a partnership firm engaged in the business of recruitment and supply of labourers. The firm, which had rendered taxable services to the tune of Rs.20.2 lacs in the financial year 2009-10, furnishes the following details pertaining to the half year ended on 30.9.2010 :
(i) Amounts collected from companies for pre-recruitment Rs.2,50,000 screening.
(ii) Amounts collected from companies for recruitment of
| Permanent Staff | 3,00,000 |
| Temporary Staff | 4,00,000 |
for conducting campus interviews in college
Wherever applicable, service tax has been charged separately and received from clients. Compute the value of taxable services rendered and the service tax payable by the assessee for the relevant half year.
Solution
Computation of value of taxable services
Particulars | Details | Amount |
Amount collected from companies for pre-recruitment screening |
| 250000 |
Amount collected from companies for recruitment of |
|
|
- Permanent Staff |
| 300000 |
- Temporary Staff |
| 400000 |
Advance received from prospective employers for Conducting campus interviews in college |
| 100000 |
Value of taxable services |
| 1050000 |
Tax on above | Rounded off | 108150 |
- Service Tax | Rs. 1050000 * 10% | 105000 |
- Education Cess | Rs. 105000 * 2% | 2100 |
- SHEC | Rs. 105000 * 1% | 1050 |
Question 1(d)
The following are details of purchases, sales, etc. effected by Vasudha & Co. a registered dealer, for the year ended 31.3.2011 :
Particulars | Amount (Rs.) |
Purchase of raw materials within State, 1000 units, inclusive of VAT levy at 6% | 5,30,000 |
Inter-State purchases of raw material, inclusive of CST at 2% | 2,04,000 |
Import of raw materials, inclusive of customs duty of Rs.35,000 | 4,35,000 |
Capital goods purchased on 1.5.2010, inclusive of VAT levy at 10% (input credit to be spread over 2 financial years) | 3,30,000 |
Other manufacturing expenses | 1,50,000 |
Sale of taxable goods within State, inclusive of VAT levy at 4% | 7,28,000 |
Sale of goods within State, exempt from levy of VAT (Goods were manufactured from the Inter-State purchase of raw materials) | 1,20,000 |
Closing stock as on 31.3.2011 was 100 units of raw materials purchased within the State |
|
Input credit is allowed only on raw materials used in manufacture of taxable goods, Compute the VAT liability of the dealer for the year ended 31.3.2011.
Solution
Computation of VAT liability
Particulars | Amount | Amount |
Output VAT payable on sale of taxable goods within State [Rs.728000 / 104% * 4%] |
| 28000 |
Less: VAT Input available |
|
|
Input VAT Credit on purchase of raw material [ Rs.530000 * 6% / 106%] | 30000 |
|
Input VAT Credit on Capital Goods [Rs.330000 * 10% / 110%] / 2 | 15000 | 45000 |
Input Credit carried forward |
| 17000 |
Notes
Input Credit is not available against payment of CST and custom duty.
Question 2(a)(i)
Miss Vivitha paid a sum of 5000 USD to Mr. Kulasekhara, a management consultant practicing in Colombo, specializing in project financing. The payment was made in Colombo. Mr. Kulasekhara is a non-resident. The consultancy related to a project in India with possible Ceylonese collaboration. Is this payment chargeable to tax in India in the hands of Mr. Kulasekhara, since the services were used in India?
Solution
As per sec.9(1)(vii), following income by way of fees for technical service shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India and hence shall liable to tax in India –
Fee for technical services payable by | Condition |
The Government | Nil |
A resident person | Such services must not be utilised in - · business or profession carried on by such person outside India; or · earning any income from any source outside India |
A non-resident person | Such services must be utilized in - · business or profession carried on by such person in India; or · earning any income from any source in India. |
In the instant case, the payment has been received from a person resident in India and relates to a project in India, hence such payment is liable to tax in India.
Question 2(a)(ii)
Mr. Praveen Kumar has furnished the following particulars relating to payments made towards scientific research for the year ended 31.3.2011.
|
| (Rs. in lacs) |
(i) | Payment made to K Research Ltd. | 20 |
(ii) | Payment made to LMN College | 15 |
(iii) | Payment made to OPQ College | 10 |
| Note : K Research Ltd. and LMN College are approved research institutions and these payments are to be used for the purposes of scientific research |
|
(iv) | Payment made to National Laboratory | 8 |
(v) | Machinery purchased for in-house scientific research | 25 |
(vi) | Salaries to research staff engaged in in-house scientific research | 12 |
Compute the amount of deduction available under section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 while arriving at the business income of the assessee.
Solution
Computation of deduction u/s 35 to Praveen Kumar for the A.Y.2011-12
Rs. In lakh
Particulars | As per Sec. | Amount | Deduction |
Payment made to K Research Ltd. | 35(1)(iia) | 20.00 | 25.00 |
Payment made to LMN College | 35(1)(ii) | 15.00 | 26.25 |
Payment made to OPQ College | NA | 10.00 | Nil |
Payment made to National Laboratory | 35(2AA) | 8.00 | 14.00 |
Machinery purchased for in-house scientific research | 35(1)(iv) | 25.00 | 25.00 |
Salaries to research staff engaged in in-house research | 35(1)(i) | 12.00 | 12.00 |
Deduction available u/s 35 |
|
| 102.25 |
Question 2(b)
During the year ended 31.3.2010, Kohli & Co., running a coaching centre has collected a sum of Rs.10.2 lacs as service tax. Rs.70,000 was met through Cenvat credit and the balance was paid by cheque on various dates. The details pertaining to the quarter ended 30.6.2010 are as under :
Particulars | Amount (Rs.) |
Value of free coaching rendered | 20,000 |
Coaching fees collected from students (Service tax collected separately) | 14,50,000 |
Advance received from a college for coaching their students, on 30.6.2010. However, no coaching was conducted and the money was returned on 12.4.2011 | 3,00,000 |
Determine the service tax liability for the quarter and indicate the date by which the service tax has to be remitted by the assessee.
Solution
Computation of service tax liability
Particulars | Details | Amount |
Value of free coaching rendered |
| Nil |
Coaching fees collected from students |
| 1450000 |
Advance received from college |
| 300000 |
Value of taxable services |
| 1750000 |
Tax on above | Rounded off | 180250 |
- Service Tax | Rs. 1750000 * 10% | 175000 |
- Education Cess | Rs. 175000 * 2% | 3500 |
- SHEC | Rs. 175000 * 1% | 1750 |
Due date of the payment of service tax (electronically) is 6th July, 2010.
It is assumed that all receipts do not include service tax.
Question 2(c)
Which variant of VAT is most widely used in the world and why? Are some services also included in the VAT net by such countries?
Solution
Refer page 20.5
Question 3(a)
Mr. Vidyasagar, resident individual aged 64, is a partner in Oscar Musicals & Co., a partnership firm. He also runs a wholesale business in medical products. The following details are made available for the year ended 31.3.2011:
|
| Rs. | Rs. |
(i) | Interest on capital received from Oscar Musicals & Co., at 15% |
| 1,50,000 |
(ii) | Interest from bank on fixed deposit (Net of TDS Rs.1,500) |
| 13,500 |
(iii) | I.T. refund received relating to asst. year 2009-10 including interest of Rs.2,300 |
| 34,500 |
(iv) | Net profit from wholesale business Amounts debited include the following: |
| 5,60,000 |
| Depreciation as per books | 34,000 |
|
| Motor car expenses | 40,000 |
|
| Municipal taxes for the shop | 7,000 |
|
| (For two half years; payment for one half year made on 12-6-2011 and for the other, on 14.11.2011) |
|
|
| Salary to manager for whom single cash payment was made for | 21,000 |
|
(v) | The WDV of the assets (as on 1.4.2010) used in above wholesale business is an under : |
|
|
| - Computers | 1,20,000 |
|
| - Motor car (20% used for personal use) | 3,20,000 |
|
(vi) | LIP paid for major son | 60,000 |
|
| PPF of his wife | 70,000 |
|
| Long-term infrastructure bonds (Approved) | 30,000 |
|
Compute the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12. The computation should show the proper heads of income. Also compute the WDV of the different blocks of assets as on 31.3.2011.
Solution
Computation of total income of Dr. Shuba for the A.Y. 2011-12
Particulars | Workings | Details | Details | Amount |
Profits & gains of business or profession |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on capital from Oscar Musical & Co. | 150000 / 15% * 12% | 120000 |
|
|
Net profit from wholesale business |
| 560000 | 680000 |
|
Add: Expenses disallowed |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation as per books of account |
| 34000 |
|
|
Motor Car expenses | 40000 * 20% | 8000 |
|
|
Municipal Tax paid | Not paid within due date of furnishing return | 3500 |
|
|
Salary to manager paid in cash [Sec. 40A(3)] |
| 21000 | 66500 |
|
Less: Depreciation allowed |
|
| 746500 |
|
- Computer |
| 72000 |
|
|
- Motor Car |
| 38400 | 110400 | 636100 |
Income from other sources |
|
|
|
|
Interest on Fixed Deposit |
|
| 15000 |
|
Interest on IT Refund |
|
| 2300 | 17300 |
Gross Total Income | 653400 | |||
Less: Deduction under chapter VIA |
| |||
U/s 80C (LIP of major son + PPF) [(Rs.60000 + Rs.70000), subject to maximum of Rs.100000] | 100000 | |||
U/s 80CCF [Long term infrastructure bond, subject to maximum of Rs.20000] | 20000 | |||
Total Income (Rounded off u/s 288A) | 533400 | |||
Notes
Computation of depreciation u/s 32
Particulars | Computer | Motor Car |
Rate of Depreciation | 60% | 15% |
W.D.V. as on 1/4/2010 | 120000 | 320000 |
Add: Purchase during the year | Nil | Nil |
| 120000 | 320000 |
Less: Sale during the year | Nil | Nil |
| 120000 | 320000 |
Depreciation | 72000 | 48000 |
Less: Personal Use |
| 9600 |
Allowable Depreciation u/s 32 | 72000 | 38400 |
Question 3(b)
I. Where any transaction of taxable service is entered into with an associated enterprise, receipt of service tax is not material for levy of service tax. Explain with reasons, whether you agree or disagree with this statement
II. Briefly discuss about the adjustment of excess amount of service tax paid in case of renting of immovable property service, owing to property tax payment.
Solution
I. Refer Page No.19.7
II. As per Rule 6(4C) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, where the person liable to pay service tax in respect of services provided or to be provided in relation to renting of immovable property, has paid to the credit of Central Government any amount in excess of the amount required to be paid towards service tax liability for a month or quarter, as the case may be, on account of non-availment of deduction of property tax paid in terms of notification No.24/2007-Service Tax, dated the 22nd May, 2007, from the gross amount charged for renting of the immovable property for the said period at the time of payment of service tax, the assessee may adjust such excess amount paid by him against his service tax liability within one year from the date of payment of such property tax. The details of such adjustment shall be intimated to the Superintendent of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the service provider within a period of fifteen days from the date of such adjustment.
Question 3(c)
M/s. Staruss & Co., a registered dealer under the local VAT law, having stock of goods purchased from outside the State, wishes to opt for the Composition Scheme. Advise him whether the same is possible. Will the VAT chain be broken if the dealer opts for the said scheme?
Solution
Refer Page No.20.24
Question 4(a)
The following are the details relating to Mr. Srivatsan, a resident Indian, aged 57, relating to the year ended 31.3.2011:
| Rs. |
Income from salaries | 2,20,000 |
Loss from house property | 1,90,000 |
Loss from cloth business | 2,40,000 |
Income from speculation business | 30,000 |
Loss from specified business covered by section 35AD | 20,000 |
Long-term capital gains from sale of urban land | 2,50,000 |
Long-term capital loss from sale of listed shares in recognized |
|
Stock exchange (STT paid) | 1,10,000 |
Loss from card games | 32,000 |
Income from betting | 45,000 |
Life Insurance Premium paid | 1,20,000 |
Compute the total-income and show the items eligible for carry forward.
Solution
Computation of total income of Mr. Srivatsan for the A.Y. 2011-12
Particulars | Details | Amount | Amount |
Salaries |
| 220000 |
|
Less: Loss under the head Income from House Property |
| 150000 | 70000 |
Income from House Property |
| (190000) |
|
Less: Adjusted with Long term capital gain from sale of urban land | 40000 |
|
|
Less: Adjusted with income under the head Salaries | 150000 | 190000 | Nil |
Profits and gains of business or profession |
|
|
|
Income from cloth business |
| (240000) |
|
Income from speculation business |
| 30000 |
|
|
| (210000) |
|
Less: Adjusted with Long term capital gain from sale of urban land |
| 210000 | Nil |
Capital Gains |
|
|
|
Long term capital gain from sale of urban land |
| 250000 |
|
Less: Loss under the Profits and gains of business or profession | 210000 |
|
|
Less: Loss under the head Income from House Property | 40000 | 250000 | Nil |
Income from Other Sources |
|
|
|
Income from betting |
|
| 45000 |
Gross Total Income | 115000 | ||
Less: Deduction u/s 80C [Deduction is not allowed from betting income] | 70000 | ||
Total Income | 45000 | ||
1. Loss of specified business u/s 35AD Rs.20000 2. Long term capital loss on sale of listed shares is not to be adjusted as gain from the same is exempted u/s 10(38) 3. Loss from card games cannot be adjusted. | |||
Question 4(b)
State the provisions which enable the Central Government to make rules for administering service tax. For what purposes are such rules made? Name any four such rules issued by the Central Government so far.
Solution
As per sec. 94 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules on the following matters for carrying out the provisions of this Chapter:
(a) collection and recovery of service tax u/s 66 and 68;
(b) the determination of amount and value of taxable service u/s 67;
(c) the time and manner and the form in which application for registration shall be made u/s 69;
(d) the form, manner and frequency of the returns to be furnished u/s 70 and the late fee for delayed furnishing of such return
(e) the manner of provisional attachment of property u/s 73C;
(f) publication of name of any person and particulars relating to any proceeding u/s 73D;
(g) the form in which appeal u/s 85 or u/s 86(6) may be filed and the manner in which they may be verified;
(h) the manner in which the memorandum of cross-objections u/s 86(4) may be verified;
(i) the credit of service tax paid on the services consumed for providing a taxable service in case where the services consumed and the service provided fall in the same category of taxable service;
(j) the credit of service tax paid on the services consumed or duties paid or deemed to have been paid on goods used for providing a taxable service;
(k) the manner of recovery of any amount due to the Central Government u/s 87;
(l) provisions for determining export of taxable services;
(m) grant of exemption to, or rebate of service tax paid on, taxable services which are exported out of India;
(n) rebate of service tax paid or payable on the taxable services consumed or duties paid or deemed to have been paid on goods used for providing taxable services which are exported out of India;
(o) the date for determination of rate of service tax and the place of provision of taxable service;
(p) rebate of service tax paid or payable on the taxable services used as input services in the manufacturing or processing of goods exported out of India u/s 93A;
(q) any other matter which by this Chapter is to be or may be prescribed.
Further Refer Page No. 19.1
Question 4(c)
What is meant by input tax credit in the context of VAT provisions? How does input tax credit help in achieving the essence of VAT?
Solution
Refer Page No. 20.14
Question 5(a)
Mr. Rakesh purchased a house property on 14th April, 1979 for Rs.1,05,000. He entered into an agreement with Mr. B for the sale of house on 15th September, 1982 and received an advance of Rs.25,000. However, since Mr. B did not remit the balance amount, Mr. Rakesh forfeited the advance. Later on, he gifted the house property to his friend Mr. A on 15th June, 1986.
Following renovations were carried out by Mr. Rakesh and Mr. A to the house property:
| Amount (Rs) |
By Mr. Rakesh during FY 1979-80 | 10,000 |
By Mr. Rakesh during FY 1983-84 | 50,000 |
By Mr. A during FY 1993-94 | 1,90,000 |
The fair market value of the property as on 1-4-1981 is Rs.1,50,000/-
Mr. A entered into an agreement with Mr. C for sale of the house on 1st June, 1995 and received an advance of Rs.80,000. The said amount was forfeited by Mr. A, since Mr. C could not fulfill the terms of the agreement.
Finally, the house was sold by Mr. A to Mr. Sanjay on 2nd January, 2011 for a consideration of Rs.12,00,000.
Compute the capital gains chargeable to tax in the hands of Mr. A for the assessment year 2011-12.
Solution
Computation of capital gain in the hands of Mr. A for the A.Y. 2011-12
Particulars | Working | Details | Amount |
Sale consideration |
|
| 1200000 |
Less: Expenses on transfer |
|
| Nil |
Net sale consideration |
|
| 1200000 |
Less: I) Indexed cost of acquisition | (Rs.150000 – Rs.80000) * 711/140 | 355500 |
|
ii) Indexed cost of improvement |
|
|
|
- incurred by Mr. Rakesh | Rs.50000 * 711/116 | 306466 |
|
- incurred by Mr. A | Rs.190000 * 711/244 | 553648 | 1215614 |
Long Term Capital Gain | (15614) | ||
Notes 1. Cost of acquisition is taken as actual cost of acquisition (i.e. Rs.105000) or fair market value as on 1/4/81 (i.e. Rs.150000) whichever is higher. Further, advance money being received and forfeited by previous owner shall not be subtracted from the cost of acquisition. However, advance money forfeited by the assessee shall be reduced from the cost of acquisition. 2. In case of cost of acquisition, index benefit is available from the year in which asset was first held by Mr. A. However, in case of cost of improvement, index benefit is available from the year in which such cost was incurred. Further, to be noted that any expenses incurred for improvement before 1-4-1981 shall be ignored. | |||
Question 5(b) & (c)
(b) Briefly explain the provisions relating to advance payment of service tax.
(c) What are the major deficiencies of VAT system in India?
Solution
b. Refer page No.19.20
c. Refer Page No.20.4
Harish Jayaraj Pvt. Ltd. is converted into Harish Jayaraj LLP on 1-1-2011.
The following particulars are available to you:
|
| (Rs.) |
(i) | WDV of land as on 1-4-2010 | 5,00,000 |
(ii) | WDV of machinery as on 1-4-2010 | 3,30,000 |
(iii) | Patents acquired on 1-6-2010 | 3,00,000 |
(iv) | Building acquired on 12-3-2009 for which deduction was allowed under section 35 AD. | 7,00,000 |
(v) | Above building was revalued as on the date of conversion into LLP as | 12,00,000 |
(vi) | Unabsorbed business loss as on 1-4-2010 (A. Y. 2007-08) | 9,00,000 |
Though the conversion into LLP took place on 1-1-2011, there was disruption of business and the assets were put into use by the LLP only from 1st March, 2011 onwards.
The company earned profits of Rs.8 lacs, prior to computation of depreciation.
Assuming that the necessary conditions laid down in section 47 (xiiib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 have been compiled with, explain the tax treatment of the above in the hands of the LLP.
Solution
Computation of depreciation if no conversion has taken place
Particulars | Amount |
Machinery [Rate 15%] |
|
W.D.V. as on 1/4/2010 | 330000 |
Add: Purchase during the year | Nil |
| 330000 |
Less: Sale during the year | Nil |
| 330000 |
Depreciation [Rs.330000 * 15%] | 49500 |
Patent [Rate 25%] |
|
W.D.V. as on 1/4/2010 | Nil |
Add: Purchase during the year | 300000 |
| 300000 |
Less: Sale during the year | Nil |
| 300000 |
Depreciation [Rs.300000 * 25%] | 75000 |
Allocation of depreciation between Harish Jayaraj Pvt Ltd. and Harish Jayaraj LLP
The depreciation shall be allocated in the ratio of number of days the assets were used by them:
Calculation of allowable depreciation to Harish Jayaraj Pvt Ltd.
Particulars | Amount |
Depreciation on machinery |
|
(Assets are used by the company from 1/4/10 to 31/12/10 i.e. 275 days, hence depreciation shall be allowed for 275 days) |
|
- Rs.49500 * 275 / 306 | 44485 |
Depreciation on Patent |
|
Patent has been used by it from 01/06/10 to 31/12/10 i.e. 214 days, hence depreciation shall be allowed for 214 days |
|
- Rs.75000 * 214 / 245 | 65510 |
Depreciation allowable u/s 32 | 109995 |
Calculation of allowable depreciation to Harish Jayaraj LLP
Particulars | Amount |
Depreciation on machinery |
|
(Assets are used by the LLP from 1/3/11 to 31/03/11 i.e. 31 days, hence depreciation shall be allowed for 31 days) |
|
- Rs.49500 * 31 / 306 | 5015 |
Depreciation on Patent |
|
Patent has been used by it from 01/03/11 to 31/03/11 i.e. 31 days, hence depreciation shall be allowed for 31 days |
|
- Rs.75000 * 31 / 245 | 9490 |
Depreciation allowable u/s 32 | 14505 |
Computation of total income of the Harish Jayaraj Pvt Ltd.
Particulars | Amount |
Net profit before depreciation | 800000 |
Less: Depreciation | 109995 |
| 690005 |
Less: Brought forward loss | 690005 |
Total Income | Nil |
Note: Balance brought forward loss of Rs.209995/- is allowed to be adjusted by LLP
Question 6(b)
Nigamanth Cargo Handlers P. Ltd. is a cargo handling agency, in existence since 2003. For the quarter ended 31-3-2011, total collections for handling cargo (excluding service tax) was Rs.32,00,000. The same included the following receipts also:
| (Rs.) |
(i) Handling of cargo containing life saving drugs | 2,00,000 |
(ii) Handling of export cargo | 3,00,000 |
(iii) Handling of cargo for storage in cold storage | 1,00,000 |
(iv) Towards providing service of packing together with transportation of cargo | 4,00,000 |
Ascertain the quantum of taxable cargo handling services for the quarter ended 31-3-2011. Wherever applicable, service tax was charged separately and received in full.
Solution
Computation of service tax liability
Particulars | Details | Amount |
Handling of cargo containing life saving drugs |
| 200000 |
Handling of export cargo |
| Nil |
Handling of cargo for storage in cold storage |
| Nil |
Towards providing service of packing together with transportation of cargo |
| 400000 |
Value of taxable services |
| 600000 |
Tax on above |
| 61800 |
- Service Tax | Rs. 600000 * 10% | 60000 |
- Education Cess | Rs. 60000 * 2% | 1200 |
- SHEC | Rs. 60000 * 1% | 600 |
Question 6(c)
How can a Chartered Accountant help a client in the handling of VAT audit called for by the Department and in conducting external audit of VAT records?
Solution
Refer Page No.20.25
Specify the persons who are authorized to sign and verify under section 140, the return of income filed under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the case of:
I. Political party;
II. Local authority;
III. Association of persons, and
IV. Limited liability Partnership (LLP).
Solution
Refer Page No.17.7
Question 7(a)(2)
The following details have been furnished by Mrs. Hemali, pertaining to the year ended 31-3-2011:
(i) Cash gift of Rs.51,000 received from her friend on the occasion of her “Shastiaptha Poorthi”, a wedding function celebrated on her husband completing 60 years of age. This was also her 25th wedding anniversary.
(ii) On the above occasion, a diamond necklace worth Rs.2 lacs was presented by her sister living in Dubai.
(iii) When she celebrated her daughter’s wedding on 21-2-2011, her friend assigned in Mrs. Hemali’s favour, a fixed deposit held by the said friend in a scheduled bank; the value of the fixed deposit and the accrued interest on the said date was Rs.51,000.
Compute the income, if any, assessable as income from other sources.
Solution
Computation of income from other sources of Mrs. Hemali for the A.Y. 2011-12
Particulars | Amount |
Gift from friend | 51000 |
Gift of diamond necklace from sister (Being a relative) | Nil |
Gift of fixed deposit (as gift is received by her and not by her daughter) | 51000 |
Income from Other Sources | 102000 |
Note: It may be argued that fixed deposit is not covered u/s 56(2)(vii) as it is neither covered under the purview of money nor under property.
Question 7(a)(3)
During the financial year 2010-11, the following payments/expenditure were made/incurred by Mr. Yuvan Raja, a resident individual (whose turnover during the year ended 31-3-2010 was Rs.39 lacs):
(i) Interest of Rs.12,000 was paid to Rehman & Co., a resident partnership firm, without deduction of tax at source;
(ii) Interest of Rs.4,000 was paid as interest to Mr.R. D. Burman, a non-resident, without deduction of tax at source;
(iii) Rs.3,00,000 was paid as salary to a resident individual without deduction of tax at source;
(iv) He had sold goods worth Rs.5 lacs to Mr. Deva. He gave Mr. Deva a cash discount of Rs.12,000 later. Commission of Rs.15,000 was paid to Mr. Vidyasagar on 2-7-2010. In none of these transactions, tax was deducted at source.
Briefly discuss whether any disallowance arises under the provisions of section 40(a)(i)/40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Solution
(i) Mr. Yuvan Raja is not liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194A as his turnover of the preceding financial year does not exceed the limit specified u/s 44AB
(ii) The assessee is liable to deduct tax at source u/s 195 on payment made to a non-resident, hence, Rs.4000 being interest paid to non-resident shall be disallowed.
(iii) Salary is not covered u/s 40(a)(ia), hence such payment is allowed.
(iv) There is no provision for deducting tax at source on discount. Further, Mr. Yuvan Raja is not liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194H as his turnover of the preceding financial year does not exceed the limit specified u/s 44AB
Question 7(b)
State the due dates for filing of service tax returns. Will the delayed filing of service tax return result in payment of any late fee? If so, how much?
Solution
Refer Page No. 19.27
Question 7(c)
Briefly list out the contents of VAT invoices
Solution
Refer Page No.20.20